Re: Writing values to relation using bytearray ...
От
Kedar Potdar
Тема
Re: Writing values to relation using bytearray ...
Дата
Msg-id
bd8134a40903060930u2907d91ftcb1b80859a48121e@mail.gmail.com
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Writing values to relation using bytearray ... Kedar Potdar <kedar.potdar@gmail.com>
Re: Writing values to relation using bytearray ... Greg Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>
Re: Writing values to relation using bytearray ... Kedar Potdar <kedar.potdar@gmail.com>
Re: Writing values to relation using bytearray ... Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Writing values to relation using bytearray ... Kedar Potdar <kedar.potdar@gmail.com>
Re: Writing values to relation using bytearray ... Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Writing values to relation using bytearray ... Greg Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>
Re: Writing values to relation using bytearray ... Greg Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>
Thanks Tom for your interest. I could find a workaround for the issue wherein the value of type which is not stored "by value" and has fixed data length, is being stored in string format to the relation. While retrieving from relation, this value is converted by using "coerce_to_specific_type()"to its native type datum represation as required. This is a bit of overhead and I'd like to find more efficient solution and will look pg_statistics data store. Regards, - Kedar - sent from a mobile device. On 3/6/09, Tom Lane wrote: > Kedar Potdar writes: >> The problem here is I need to store values of different types into >> bytearray >> column of relation. > > Perhaps you should study the ANALYZE code. AFAICS your requirements are > not different from those of the pg_statistic data store. You should do > things the same way they are done there, if only to reduce the surprise > factor for readers of the code. > > regards, tom lane >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления