Re: [HACKERS] Faster methods for getting SPI results

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Chapman Flack
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Faster methods for getting SPI results
Дата
Msg-id bb837e10-55b0-d509-de42-0628cb45dee7@anastigmatix.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Faster methods for getting SPI results  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Faster methods for getting SPI results  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 09/12/2017 03:41 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> So the conclusion at the end of the last commitfest was that this patch
> should be marked Returned With Feedback, and no new work appears to have
> been done on it since then.  Why is it in this fest at all?  There
> certainly doesn't seem to be any reason to review it again.

I'm not sure how to read the history of the CF entry. Could it
have rolled over to 2017-09 by default if its status was simply
never changed to Returned with Feedback as intended in the last
one? The history doesn't seem to show anything since 2017-03-19.

I would still advocate for a fast-callback/slow-callback distinction,
as in
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/59813946.40508%40anastigmatix.net
if that does not seem overcomplicated to more experienced hands.

-Chap


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: [HACKERS] Renaming PG_GETARG functions (was Re: PG_GETARG_GISTENTRY?)
Следующее
От: Michael Banck
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Create replication slot in pg_basebackup if requestedand not yet present