Re: MERGE PARTITIONS and DEPENDS ON EXTENSION.
| От | Matheus Alcantara |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: MERGE PARTITIONS and DEPENDS ON EXTENSION. |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | ba3bef38-76db-46e7-bb22-5260207fb86d@gmail.com обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: MERGE PARTITIONS and DEPENDS ON EXTENSION. (Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: MERGE PARTITIONS and DEPENDS ON EXTENSION.
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 22/04/26 08:24, Alexander Korotkov wrote: >>> +-- An index created directly on a partition has no parent in the partitioned >>> +-- index tree; merge must ignore such indexes (they disappear with the old >>> +-- partition). >>> +CREATE INDEX part_extdep_3_extra_idx ON part_extdep_3(x); >>> +ALTER TABLE part_extdep MERGE PARTITIONS (part_extdep_merged, part_extdep_3) >>> + INTO part_extdep_merged2; >>> +SELECT relname FROM pg_class >>> +WHERE relname LIKE 'part_extdep_merged2%idx' ORDER BY relname; >> >> Looks like this test is also redundant? This does not test new DEPENDS ON logic. > > I've added the dependency on this index to check index disappears with > its dependency. I think this would make this test more relevant. > > Kirill, Matheus, are you ok with these change? > It works for me. -- Matheus Alcantara EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: