Re: Mislabeled timestamp functions (was Re: [SQL] [NOVICE] date_trunc'd timestamp index possible?)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Mike Rylander
Тема Re: Mislabeled timestamp functions (was Re: [SQL] [NOVICE] date_trunc'd timestamp index possible?)
Дата
Msg-id b918cf3d04100307495428fe3e@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Mislabeled timestamp functions (was Re: [SQL] [NOVICE] date_trunc'd timestamp index possible?)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Not that my 2c is worth 1c, but I second this.  I'd rather initdb now
than get bitten by some catalog difference when I move my DB into
production. :)

--miker

On Sat, 02 Oct 2004 14:22:50 -0400, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
[...]
> 
> > I'd prefer if all users of 8.0 were guaranteed to have the same catalog.
> 
> Well, there's something to be said for that viewpoint too.  Anyone else
> feel the same?
[...]


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Gavin Sherry
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: SQL-Invoked Procedures for 8.1
Следующее
От: "Scott Marlowe"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: OT moving from MS SQL to PostgreSQL