On 2020-05-27 23:42, Christopher Browne wrote:
> d) systemd is a Controversial System; the folk that seem particularly
> irate about it seem to be "Old Bearded Sysadmins" that hate the idea of
> redoing their understandings of how Unix systems initialize. Personally,
> my feelings are ambivalent; I'm using it where I find some use, and have
> not been displeased with my results. And since modern systems now have
> USB and network devices added and dropped on a whim, there's a critical
> need for something newer with more dynamic responses than old SysV
> Init. But I certainly "get" that some aren't so happy with it, and I'm
> not thrilled at the ongoing scope creep that never seems to end.
It is worth noting that systemd did not go for a one-binary-for-all
approach. It has different binaries for different parts of the
functionality. systemctl for controlling services, journalctl for
controlling the journal, etc. Just as a data point to show that there
is no single "new" way to do things.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services