Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Amit Langote
Тема Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning
Дата
Msg-id b8c77817-5071-e829-8967-eaa5308102a1@lab.ntt.co.jp
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning  (Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar.raghuwanshi@enterprisedb.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning  (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 2017/10/30 14:55, Amit Langote wrote:
> Fixed in the attached updated patch, along with a new test in 0001 to
> cover this case.  Also, made a few tweaks to 0003 and 0005 (moved some
> code from the former to the latter) around the handling of ScalarArrayOpExprs.

Sorry, I'd forgotten to include some changes.

In the previous versions, RT index of the table needed to be passed to
partition.c, which I realized is no longer needed, so I removed that
requirement from the interface.  As a result, patches 0002 and 0003 have
changed in this version.

Thanks,
Amit

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Reading timeline from pg_control on replication slave
Следующее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Parallel worker error