Re: Proper object locking for GRANT/REVOKE

On 11.11.24 08:53, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
>> Maybe it would be better to push the assertion into get_object_address(),
>> something like
>>
>>      Assert(!relation || relp)
>>
>> near the end.
> 
> That looks like a good idea to me, that would make the code cleaner and easier
> to understand.
> 
>> Meaning, if you pass NULL for the relp argument, then you
>> don't expect a relation.  This is kind of what will happen now anyway,
>> except with a segfault instead of an assertion.
> 
> Yeah, I like it.
> 
> So, something like the attached (provided as .txt file to no mess up the CF bot
> entry related to this thread) could be applied before?

Thanks.  I have applied your patch and then also mine with the 
appropriate adjustments.