Re: client_connection_check_interval default value
| От | Laurenz Albe |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: client_connection_check_interval default value |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | b821da13765cd5a0c948e60cd5cd38856840d021.camel@cybertec.at обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: client_connection_check_interval default value (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: client_connection_check_interval default value
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2026-02-18 at 14:30 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote: > On Fri, Feb 6, 2026 at 9:01 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > > The issue is that backends blocked in ProcSleep() are woken up every > > > client_connection_check_interval and may emit a "still waiting" message > > > each time if log_lock_waits is enabled. To mitigate this, just one idea is > > > to add a flag to track whether the "still waiting" message has already been > > > emitted during a call to ProcSleep(), and suppress further messages > > > once it has been logged. > > > > Independently of what's the default, it seems like it'd be valuable to > > make that interaction better. I think it is reasonable to keep on > > emitting "still waiting" every so often, but we could probably > > rate-limit that to a lot less than every 2 seconds. > > Attached is a patch that rate-limits the "still waiting on lock" message > to at most once every 10s. > > I chose 10s instead of the suggested 2s, since 2s felt too short. But we can > discuss the appropriate interval and adjust it if needed. The value is > currently hard-coded, as making it configurable does not seem necessary. I think that 10 seconds is good. Yours, Laurenz Albe
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: