Re: Rangejoin rebased
От | Alexander Kuzmenkov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Rangejoin rebased |
Дата | |
Msg-id | b78f5c6c-e7c5-b3a3-d56a-778f33c0b277@postgrespro.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Rangejoin rebased (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Rangejoin rebased
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 16.01.2018 10:49, Jeff Davis wrote: > My proposed fix is to make an internal opfamily identical to the > external one, such that it's not recognized as part of the same EC, > and the planner won't try to eliminate it. It loses out on potential > optimizations, but those are mostly theoretical since the btree > opclass ordering for ranges is not very interesting to a user. I think I figured out what to do with missing sort directions. We can change select_outer_pathkeys_for_merge() to generate the pathkeys we need. Also, find_mergeclauses_for_outer_pathkeys() has to be changed too, so that it knows which pathkeys are compatible to which range join clauses. About the patch, do I understand it right that you are working on the next version now? -- Alexander Kuzmenkov Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com The Russian Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: