Cheers for DISTINCT ON

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Kovacs
Тема Cheers for DISTINCT ON
Дата
Msg-id b6e8f2e80801070802n7b04b0e3lbbec1d284bef1f9f@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: Cheers for DISTINCT ON  (Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>)
Re: Cheers for DISTINCT ON  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Список pgsql-sql
I just wanted to give my cheers for DISTINCT ON. It is a great
feature, I've just found a really good use for it. I am just wondering
why it didn't make it into the standards.

On a slightly unrelated note, I had the opportunity to work with EQUEL
for a short period of time some 15 years ago before I started getting
famililar with SQL. I clearly remember the disappointment/surprise I
felt as I was struggling to translate some of the constructs I used
with EQUEL into SQL. At that time, I thought that (the by then
defunct) EQUEL was much more
expressive/intuitive/flexible/easier-to-use than SQL. I've been
wondering ever since why the worse so often gets the upper-hand over
the better. (I am obviously having a hard time "growing-up" :-) )

Cheers,
Peter


В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Gerardo Herzig
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: reading WAL files in python
Следующее
От: Andrew Sullivan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Cheers for DISTINCT ON