On 10/28/07, Nicholas E. Wakefield <nwakefield@kineticnetworks.com> wrote:
> You could just use the glassfish implementation of JPA (Toplink) if you want to avoid a ton of jars in your
classpath.I've tried out most of the other JPA implementations and found the glassfish implementation the easiest one
toget started with but have since moved to another implementation for various reasons.
Would it be possible to know more about this ("but have since moved to
another implementation for various reasons").
Thanks
Peter
>
> This is an old article but should get you started
> http://blogs.sun.com/Glassfish_PostgreSQL/entry/introducing_support_for_postgresql_in
>
> If you don't use an application server you will need to manage the entity manager yourself.
>
> When you say resources, what resources in particular are you referring to?
>
> The code below should work, check your dialect and if that's correct, try another JPA implementation. What's the
exacterror you are getting?
>
> @Entity
> @Table(name = "PRODUCTLINE", schema = "CLASSICCARS", uniqueConstraints = {})
> public class Productline implements java.io.Serializable {
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: pgsql-jdbc-owner@postgresql.org on behalf of Robert Wimmer
> Sent: Sat 10/27/2007 2:04 PM
> To: John R Pierce; pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [JDBC] JPA and Postgresql
>
>
>
> >
> >
> > minimal in what way? smallest possible memory footprint? easiest
> > to deploy on some specific platform?
> >
>
>
> easiest to deploy on eclipse (3.3) with minimal resources in that sense
> - if possible no Hibernate
> - if possible no Application Server
>
> regards sepp
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> Jetzt 30 Gratis-Emoticons für Windows Live Messenger downloaden! Windows Live Messenger
<http://www.livemessenger-emoticons.com/de-at/>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
>