On 7/28/25 16:47, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> I can't remember who wrote this line, but it was borrowed from the
> --analyze-in-stages description. The point is that if you use
> --analyze-in-stages without --missing-stats-only, there will be a period
> where existing statistics will be replaced with ones generated with lower
> statistics targets.
Aha, it makes sense now, thank you!
> Obviously, this wording isn't clear enough. We might
> need to either remove that sentence or add "When used in conjunction with
> --analyze-in-stages..."
I vote for the second option.