Re: Proposal: QUALIFY clause
От | Vik Fearing |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proposal: QUALIFY clause |
Дата | |
Msg-id | b4ed9908-f000-4a5d-aae8-625607f80757@postgresfriends.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Proposal: QUALIFY clause ("Matheus Alcantara" <matheusssilv97@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 25/07/2025 14:55, Matheus Alcantara wrote: > On Mon Jul 21, 2025 at 7:11 PM -03, Vik Fearing wrote: >> SELECT a, b, c >> FROM tab >> QUALIFY wf() OVER () = ? >> >> >> can be rewritten as: >> >> >> SELECT a, b, c >> FROM ( >> SELECT a, b, c, wf() OVER () = ? AS qc >> FROM tab >> ) AS q >> WHERE qc >> >> >> and then let the optimizer take over. The standard does this kind of >> thing all over the place; I don't know what the postgres project's >> position on doing things like this are. > With this transformation users will see a Subquery plan node even if > it's not present on the original query, is that expected or it can be > confusing to users? This is a definition technique, it does not need to be implemented as a subquery. -- Vik Fearing
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: