Re: Documentation building broken in CFBot

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: Documentation building broken in CFBot
Дата
Msg-id b4bfad8a-cf66-da11-0cbe-0e03189a0c32@enterprisedb.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Documentation building broken in CFBot  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Documentation building broken in CFBot
Список pgsql-www
On 2020-11-26 18:24, Tom Lane wrote:
> This came up again today on another thread [1], so I took a second look
> and confirmed that configure's test is completely dead code.  So here is
> a patch to remove it outright, mooting the question of whether it ought
> to use --no-net.
> 
> After removing PGAC_CHECK_DOCBOOK, there wasn't much left of docbook.m4,
> and what there was had little to do with docbook; so I chose to just
> remove that file altogether.
> 
> This is actually entirely independent of Peter's patch.  I'm tempted
> to propose that we could back-patch it and thereby save some configure
> cycles for developers, since it has no impact on anybody's build
> process.

Yes, this seems fine.  docbook.m4 used to do more interesting things, 
when we had DSSSL, and no catalog mechanisms, and generally more 
complicated installations.  It also served as a sort of test suite, when 
if someone complained that they can't build the documentation, we could 
look at config.log to see if their tools were installed correctly.  But 
right now it's not that interesting anymore.

Backpatching to PG11 should be okay.  Before that, it's different tools.



В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Documentation building broken in CFBot
Следующее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Documentation building broken in CFBot