Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Use latch instead of select() in walreceiver

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Use latch instead of select() in walreceiver
Дата
Msg-id b4be6ea7-1e88-1cd3-d179-e31985b3f2e9@2ndquadrant.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Список pgsql-hackers
On 12/1/16 8:50 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> +           if (rc & WL_POSTMASTER_DEATH)
> +               exit(1);
> Hmm. We have always been very careful about not leaving immediately
> from libpqwalreceiver.c which is an independent shared library so as
> the WAL receiver can take cleanup actions. See here for more details:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAEepm=0hg_FX7kdUhosTpJ_kPsUZw6k-7nuQNy-dGAOaetn_tA@mail.gmail.com

walreceiver.c does the same thing.  The message you pointed out is not
exactly clear why that would be wrong.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Logical Replication WIP
Следующее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Parallel tuplesort (for parallel B-Tree index creation)