On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Joshua D. Drake<jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 13:24 -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
>> In actual practice, full query logging
>> is 1/50 the amount of disk I/O as the actual database activity. If your
>> systems are so stressed that they can't handle another 2% increase, then
>> you've got bigger problems lurking.
>
> It depends on the system. I have seen even big systems take a huge hit
> by full logging due to transactional velocity.
>
> Joshua D. Drake
I've seen this too. On high transaction load systems, log_statement
has big overhead. I haven't tested this lately though, and I suspect
this information is version dependent (in the 'old' days, it used to
be a really big deal).
merlin