Re: using composite types in insert/update

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Merlin Moncure
Тема Re: using composite types in insert/update
Дата
Msg-id b42b73150901301147q42986dc6oe94260b2bee06d6c@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: using composite types in insert/update  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: using composite types in insert/update  (Sam Mason <sam@samason.me.uk>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 1/30/09, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com> writes:
>  > You are missing the point, using the composite type allows you to
>  > build the insert without knowing the specific layout of the
>  > table...
>
> Surely at *some* level you have to know that.

You don't (if I understand your meaning) ...you just have to make sure
the destination of the insert is the same as the source.  With 'tables
as composite types', this is trivially easy as long as you make sure
the destination schema matches (basically, the whole point of ad-hoc
dblink based replication).

Fix up the composite types, and you can now make context free triggers
that ship records around without exposing any detail of the record
except a candidate key, which can be solved by convention
(foo->foo_id).

merlin


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: ecpg grammar in CVS is annoying
Следующее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: ecpg grammar in CVS is annoying