Re: You may need to increase mas_loks_per_trasaction
| От | Claus Guttesen |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: You may need to increase mas_loks_per_trasaction |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | b41c75520809050537q14bbe7f8n4df8066a3e6f7099@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | You may need to increase mas_loks_per_trasaction ("Jonas Pacheco" <jonas@migrate.com.br>) |
| Список | pgsql-performance |
> Considering a quad core server processor, 4 GBs of RAM memory, disk Sata > 2. > > What is the recommended setting for the parameters: > > max_connections:70 Depends on how many clients that access the database. > shared_buffers? I have mine at 512 MB but I will lower it and see how it affects performance. I have 16 GB in my server. > max_fsm_relations? > max_fsm_pages? Perform a vacuum analyze verbose and look at the last few lines. This will tell you whether you need to increase max_fsm_*. Consider lowering random_page_cost so it favoes indexex more often than seq. scans. But if you don't get a decent raid-controller your data will move slow and tuning will only make a minor difference. -- regards Claus When lenity and cruelty play for a kingdom, the gentler gamester is the soonest winner. Shakespeare
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: