Re: meson's in-tree libpq header search order vs -Dextra_include_dirs

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Heikki Linnakangas
Тема Re: meson's in-tree libpq header search order vs -Dextra_include_dirs
Дата
Msg-id b3796a7b-8f78-4a2d-ba74-24e00f2ca71e@iki.fi
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: meson's in-tree libpq header search order vs -Dextra_include_dirs  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: meson's in-tree libpq header search order vs -Dextra_include_dirs
Re: meson's in-tree libpq header search order vs -Dextra_include_dirs
Список pgsql-hackers
On 14/09/2025 06:23, Thomas Munro wrote:
> Added to commitfest: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/patch/6056/
> 
> I'm having to carry this patch in all my development branches for now
> or I can't build on one of my regular dev machines, so I'm quite keen
> to get this into the tree soon and would back-patch to 16.
> 
> I gather no one else is affected yet, but I assume you can see the
> problem on a Mac by installing PostgreSQL with Homebrew/MacPorts, or
> on CI if you do this to .cirrus.tasks.yml:
> 
>     setup_additional_packages_script: |
> -    #pkg install -y ...
> +    pkg install -y postgresql17-client

The patch seems harmless enough to me, no objections to committing it. 
However, I'm worried that we'll soon break it again. The new rule is 
apparently "include libpq first", but we have no way of enforcing it.

- Heikki




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: