On 18/03/2008, Craig Ringer <craig@postnewspapers.com.au> wrote:
> Isn't a 10 or 24 spindle RAID 5 array awfully likely to encounter a
> double disk failure (such as during the load imposed by rebuild onto a
> spare) ?
I never said that we actually USED that set-up. I just said
I did extensive testing with varied RAID-setups. ;} We did go
with the 10 in the end because of that very consideration.
It's just that the mantra "RAID5 = slow writes" isn't quite true.
Cheers,
Andrej
--
Please don't top post, and don't use HTML e-Mail :} Make your quotes concise.
http://www.american.edu/econ/notes/htmlmail.htm