Re: to_date_valid()

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: to_date_valid()
Дата
Msg-id b28373f4-7e37-3bc4-25a5-65aef4006cf0@2ndquadrant.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: to_date_valid()  (Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>)
Ответы Re: to_date_valid()  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 7/5/16 4:24 AM, Albe Laurenz wrote:
> But notwithstanding your feeling that you would like your application
> to break if it makes use of this behaviour, it is a change that might
> make some people pretty unhappy - nobody can tell how many.

What is the use of the existing behavior?  You get back an arbitrary
implementation dependent value.  We don't even guarantee what the value
will be.  If we changed it to return a different implementation
dependent value, would users get upset?

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Vik Fearing
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PoC: Make it possible to disallow WHERE-less UPDATE and DELETE
Следующее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [sqlsmith] Failed assertion in joinrels.c