Re: still memory leaks with libpgtcl
| От | Gerhard Hintermayer |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: still memory leaks with libpgtcl |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | avjlg4$28o0$1@news.hub.org обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: still memory leaks with libpgtcl (ljb <lbayuk@mindspring.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-interfaces |
Here's a short answer on my posting "deep Tcl_Channel question" to c.l.t. >>Can anybody of the tcl-gurus please enlighten me.>>I have a problem with the tcl extension to the postgreSQL database.>>Theextension wraps a client channel around an existing TCP-Socket>>(which ist created by an external library).>>Theproblem is, that the closeProc of the created Tcl_Channel is>>sometimes called with interp NULL and sometimeswith a valid interp.>>Some tcl-functions are very unhappy with passed NULL-interp (e.g.>>Tcl_DontCallWhenDeleted).>>>>Myquestion is: When is the close proc passed a valid interp and when>>a NULL pointeras parameter ?>>>>Thanks>>>>Gerhard >Off hand, I think Tcl_Close() is called with a NULL interp when Tcl is>shutting down. Or, if the channel was never associatedto a particular>interp with Tcl_RegisterChannel().>>If you use Tcl_RegisterChannel(), you might not need to usea>Tcl_InterpDeleteProc for Tcl_CallWhenDeleted().>-->David Gravereaux <davygrvy@pobox.com>>[species: human; planet: earth,milkyway,alphasector] This is just like I did see it, in a normal interpreter shutdown and in case of an error interp is NULL, and a valid interp else. So I think it is ok, to check for NULL interp berfore calling Tcl functions that don't check for NULL pointers themselves. Tom are you happy with that explanation ? Gerhard
В списке pgsql-interfaces по дате отправления: