On Mon, 17 Mar 2014, Tom Lane wrote:
> I'm guessing from those path names that you are using self-compiled
> executables, not somebody's packaging? If the latter, whose? I'm
> confused as to how you got pg_upgrade installed without knowing where it
> came from.
Tom,
Both were buit with scripts from SlackBuilds.org. The 9.0.5 pg_upgrade in
/opt/postgresql-9.0.5/contrib/ is datestamped Sep 22, 2011; I don't see that
I actually built and installed it or pg_upgrade_support (that's also there
as source, but neither built nor installed). Three-and-a-half years later
I've no recollection from where I downloaded them.
> contrib is part of the main PG distribution. The sources for pg_upgrade
> would be under contrib/pg_upgrade/ in an unpacked tarball, and
> pg_upgrade_support lives next door in contrib/pg_upgrade_support/. If you
> did a "make install" in contrib/ that would've installed both.
A-ha! Running 'pg_upgrade --help' tells me that it is, indeed, installed.
And, it is the version for -9.3.3, too. So, this question's been answered.
> That's pretty much the base case. If none of the other options appeal to
> you, don't use 'em.
Nah, nothing looks like I need them.
Much appreciated,
Rich
--
Richard B. Shepard, Ph.D. | Have knowledge, will travel.
Applied Ecosystem Services, Inc. |
www.appl-ecosys.com Voice: 503-667-4517 Fax: 503-667-8863