Re: generic options for explain

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Greg Smith
Тема Re: generic options for explain
Дата
Msg-id alpine.GSO.2.01.0905242248100.8633@westnet.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: generic options for explain  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sun, 24 May 2009, Tom Lane wrote:

> A serious problem with EXPLAIN via a function returning set, or with
> putting the result into a table, is that set results are logically
> unordered, just as table contents are.

Fair enough; I think Pavel and myself were presuming an implied "line 
number" in the output there that, as you point out, doesn't actually 
exist.  The actual implementation detail there doesn't really change the 
spirit of what I was trying to suggest though:  that this feature should 
get designed starting with the expected output and how to generate it, 
then work backwards towards how you pass it parameters.

On that topic, I though Tom Raney was the latest to update code for the 
XML output at least.  Code and a presentation going over everything is at 
http://web.cecs.pdx.edu/~raneyt/gsoc/ and there's a video at 
http://www.postgresqlconference.org/2008/west/talks/

A note about that got sent to this list at one point but I don't see any 
follow-up: 
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-06/msg00802.php

Anybody have a better idea of what happened with that project than me?

--
* Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: generic options for explain
Следующее
От: Andrew McNamara
Дата:
Сообщение: No sanity checking performed on binary TIME parameters.