Re: [PATCH] pgbench: add multiconnect option
От | Fabien COELHO |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] pgbench: add multiconnect option |
Дата | |
Msg-id | alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2203161017060.843430@pseudo обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] pgbench: add multiconnect option (Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] pgbench: add multiconnect option
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hello Greg, > It looks like David sent a patch and Fabien sent a followup patch. But > there hasn't been a whole lot of discussion or further patches. > > It sounds like there are some basic questions about what the right > interface should be. Are there specific questions that would be > helpful for moving forward? Review the designs and patches and tell us what you think? Personnaly, I think that allowing multiple connections is a good thing, especially if the code impact is reduced, which is the case with the version I sent. Then for me the next step would be to have a reconnection on errors so as to implement a client-side failover policy that could help testing a server-failover performance impact. I have done that internally but it requires that "Pgbench Serialization and deadlock errors" to land, as it would just be another error that can be handled. -- Fabien.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: