Re: [PATCH] Missing links between system catalog documentationpages

Hello Tom,

>>> I didn't think there was much point in linkifying both in that case, 
>>> and other similar situations.
>
>> The point is that the user reads a sentence, attempts to jump but 
>> sometimes can't, because the is not the first occurrence. I'd go for 
>> all mentions of another relation should be link.
>
> That has not been our practice up to now, eg in comparable cases in
> discussions of GUC variables, only the first reference is xref-ified.
> I think it could be kind of annoying to make every reference a link,
> both for regular readers (the link decoration is too bold in most
> browsers)

Hmmm. That looks like an underlying CSS issue, not that links are 
intrinsically bad.

I find it annoying that the same thing appears differently from one line 
to the next. It seems I'm the only one who likes things to be uniform, 
though.

> and for users of screen-reader software.

I do not know about those, and what constraints it puts on markup.

-- 
Fabien.