Re: Patch to document base64 encoding
| От | Fabien COELHO |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Patch to document base64 encoding |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | alpine.DEB.2.21.2001051231500.1648@pseudo обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Patch to document base64 encoding ("Karl O. Pinc" <kop@meme.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Patch to document base64 encoding
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hello Karl,
> Attached is doc_base64_v11.patch
Patch applies cleanly and compiles.
I'm in favor of moving and reorganizing these function descriptions, as
they are somehow scattered with a unclear logic when you are looking for
them.
+ <entry><literal><parameter>bytea</parameter> <literal>||</literal>
+ <parameter>bytea</parameter></literal></entry>
<entry> <type>bytea</type> </entry>
<entry>
String concatenation
Bytea concatenation?
I'm not keen on calling the parameter the name of its type. I'd suggest to
keep "string" as a name everywhere, which is not a type name in Pg.
The functions descriptions are not homogeneous. Some have parameter name &
type "btrim(string bytea, bytes bytea)" and others only type or parameter
with tagged as a parameter "get_bit(bytea, offset)" (first param),
"sha224(bytea)".
I'd suggest to be consistent, eg use "string bytea" everywhere
appropriate.
--
Fabien.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: