Re: Odd behavior with 'currval'
| От | Steven Hirsch |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Odd behavior with 'currval' |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | alpine.DEB.2.20.1802081343110.5809@z87 обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Odd behavior with 'currval' (Melvin Davidson <melvin6925@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Odd behavior with 'currval'
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
On Thu, 8 Feb 2018, Melvin Davidson wrote: > I believe your problem is in your usage. > In order for currval(regclass) to work, you must first do a > SELECT nextval(regclass) in your _current transaction_! > > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/functions-sequence.html I AM doing that. It is returning zero. The code is identical to that used in all other tables in the schema - all of them work. This one does not - unless I use the INSERT .. RETURNING .. approach. I suspect the weirdness with the sequence not being found is part of the underlying problem. --
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: