Re: [HACKERS] proposal: psql command \graw
От | Fabien COELHO |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] proposal: psql command \graw |
Дата | |
Msg-id | alpine.DEB.2.20.1708240849080.2606@lancre обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] proposal: psql command \graw (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] proposal: psql command \graw
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
>> "column_header" is somehow redundant with "tuples_only". Use the >> existing one instead of adding a new one? > > It is different - a result of tuples_only is just tuples - not column > names, not title, footer. I needed new special flag for enhancing > tuples_only to print column names I do not understand. If you keep the special print_raw function, it can use tuples_only as true for without column names, and false for with column names? >> More generally, ISTM that the same effect could be achieved without >> adding a new print function, but by setting more options (separator, >> ...) and calling an existing print function. If so, I think it would >> reduce the code size. > > Maybe, maybe not. removing PRINT_RAW you need to enhance PRINT_UNALIGNED to > use one shot parameters and you have to teach it to print column names in > tuples_only mode. The code's length will be same. The form of this patch is > not final. Hmmm. Ok. It depends on the change implication on the print unaligned function. -- Fabien.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: