> may be this it because of "end_offset + 1" in expr_scanner_chomp_substring ?
> Why there is + 1 there?
Thanks for the debug! Here is a v9 which does a rebase after the
reindentation and fixes the bad offset.
--
Fabien.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers