Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add missing support for new nodefields
| От | Fabien COELHO |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add missing support for new nodefields |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | alpine.DEB.2.20.1703212146050.22754@lancre обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add missing support for new nodefields (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hello Andres, >> It is not done yet, but it looks that it can work in the end with limited >> effort. Currently it works for copy & equal. > > It'd have to do out/read as well imo. Sure. This part is WIP, though. >> Is there some interest to generate the x00kB of sources rather than edit >> them everytime, or forgetting it from time to time, or does everyone like it >> as it is? > > From my POV yes. But it's not quite as trivial as just generating it > based on fields. Some fields are intentionally skipped, e.g. location, > for equalfuncs, but not copy/out/readfuncs. So there needs to be a way > to specify such special rules. Indeed, I noticed these particularities... For some case it can be automated with limited input. For really special cases (eg a few read/out functions) , the script is told to skip some node types and the special manual version is taken from the file instead of being generated. -- Fabien.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: