Hello Corey,
About v18: Patch applies, make check ok, psql tap tests ok.
ISTM that contrary to the documentation "\elif something" is not evaluated
in all cases, and the resulting code is harder to understand with a nested
switch and condition structure:
switch default read if switch
I wish (this is a personal taste) it could avoid switch-nesting on the
very same value. It should also conform to the documentation.
If there is no compelling reason for the switch-nesting, I would suggest
to move the read_boolean_expression before the swich, to deal with error
immediately there, and then to have just one switch.
Alternatively if the structure must really be kept, then deal with errors
in a first switch, read value *after* switch and deal with other errors
there, then start a second switch, and adjust the documentation
accordingly?
switch errors read if errors // no error switch
Also, the %R documentation has single line marker '^' before not executed
'@', but it is the reverse in the code.
--
Fabien.