Re: [HACKERS] Packages: Again

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Fabien COELHO
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Packages: Again
Дата
Msg-id alpine.DEB.2.20.1701112055060.11499@lancre
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на [HACKERS] Packages: Again  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Packages: Again  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] Packages: Again  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Re: [HACKERS] Packages: Again  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> I think we need to focus on things that _can't_ be done first, rather
> than things that require porting, e.g. until we had savepoints, you
> couldn't migrate an application that needed it.  It wasn't a question of
> porting --- there was just no way to port it.
>
> Those _missing_ pieces should be a priority.

Nested/autonomous transactions? Do they occur often in PL/SQL code?

-- 
Fabien.



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Pavel Stehule
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Packages: Again
Следующее
От: Stephen Frost
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Packages: Again