Re: [HACKERS] Packages: Again
| От | Fabien COELHO |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Packages: Again |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | alpine.DEB.2.20.1701112055060.11499@lancre обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | [HACKERS] Packages: Again ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Packages: Again
Re: [HACKERS] Packages: Again Re: [HACKERS] Packages: Again |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
> I think we need to focus on things that _can't_ be done first, rather > than things that require porting, e.g. until we had savepoints, you > couldn't migrate an application that needed it. It wasn't a question of > porting --- there was just no way to port it. > > Those _missing_ pieces should be a priority. Nested/autonomous transactions? Do they occur often in PL/SQL code? -- Fabien.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: