Re: [HACKERS] Packages: Again
| От | Fabien COELHO |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Packages: Again |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | alpine.DEB.2.20.1701112042300.11499@lancre обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Packages: Again (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
> We have a schemas instead - the PostgreSQL schema is close to Oracle > packages. Yes, a schema is a kind of a "namespace"-level package. Pg also has extensions, which is a group things put together, which may also contribute to packaging. > What we cannot to substitute are package variables, now - see my proposal > for session variables. I would like also to point out here that Pg has dynamic text session variables with a horrible syntax, aka user-defined GUCs. They can be the basis for more useful variables if extended with privacy/some access control, typing, better syntax, possibly some kind of persistent declarations, and so on. > [...] Good luck with your migration... -- Fabien.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: