Re: [HACKERS] RustgreSQL

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Fabien COELHO
Тема Re: [HACKERS] RustgreSQL
Дата
Msg-id alpine.DEB.2.20.1701081105280.10378@lancre
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] RustgreSQL  (Gavin Flower <GavinFlower@archidevsys.co.nz>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] RustgreSQL  (Craig Ringer <craig.ringer@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
>> Is this completely unrealistic or is it carved in stone PostgreSQL will 
>> always be a C project forever and ever?
>
> From my very limited understanding, PostgreSQL is more likely to be converted 
> to C++!

ISTM that currently pg is written C89. Personnaly I think that C99 
(standard from 18 years ago...) would be a progress, but this has been 
rejected in the past because of portability issues on some platforms (eg 
MS Visual C++ started to support part of C99 in ... 2013).

-- 
Fabien.



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Gavin Flower
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] RustgreSQL
Следующее
От: "Greg Sabino Mullane"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] RustgreSQL