Re: [HACKERS] proposal: session server side variables
| От | Fabien COELHO |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] proposal: session server side variables |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | alpine.DEB.2.20.1612281531390.4911@lancre обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] proposal: session server side variables (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] proposal: session server side variables
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
> For security the variable should be persistent. Why should they? If it is a session variable, being created when needed or used with the right type could be enough? > If you would to do statical analyse (what you usually would), then variable > should be persistent. I do not understand what static analysis you would need/want to do on session variables. > Currently the big issue of plpgsql_check is work with temporary tables. Do you mean that temporary table are too slow/costly? > Local objects or dynamic sql is stop for static check. Hmm. If something is dynamic, it is not static, but I do not understand your point. -- Fabien.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: