Re: heap_sync seems rather oblivious to partitioned tables(wal_level=minimal)
От | Steve Singer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: heap_sync seems rather oblivious to partitioned tables(wal_level=minimal) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | alpine.DEB.2.11.1811012241440.3854@opti.atlantida обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: heap_sync seems rather oblivious to partitioned tables (wal_level=minimal) (David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: heap_sync seems rather oblivious to partitioned tables (wal_level=minimal)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 1 Nov 2018, David Rowley wrote: > > I ended up going with: > > However, this consideration only applies when > <xref linkend="guc-wal-level"/> is <literal>minimal</literal> for > non-partitioned tables as all commands must write WAL otherwise. > > > I've changed this to: > > Rows will be frozen only if the table being loaded has been created > or truncated in the current subtransaction, there are no cursors > open and there are no older snapshots held by this transaction. It is > currently not possible to perform a <command>COPY FREEZE</command> on > a partitioned table. > > Which is just the original text with the new sentence tagged onto the end. > >> Other than that the patch looks fine and works as expected. >> >> The new status of this patch is: Waiting on Author > > Thanks for looking at this. I've attached an updated patch. I am happy with the changes. I think the patch is ready for a committer. > > -- > David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ > PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services > Steve
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: