Re: Partitioned checkpointing
| От | Fabien COELHO |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Partitioned checkpointing |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | alpine.DEB.2.10.1509101131430.28533@sto обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Partitioned checkpointing (Takashi Horikawa <t-horikawa@aj.jp.nec.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hello Takashi-san,
I suggest that you have a look at the following patch submitted in June:
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/6/260/
And these two threads:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/alpine.DEB.2.10.1408251900211.11151@sto/
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/alpine.DEB.2.10.1506011320000.28433@sto/
Including many performance figures under different condition in the second
thread. I'm not sure how it would interact with what you are proposing,
but it is also focussing on improving postgres availability especially on
HDD systems by changing how the checkpointer write buffers with sorting
and flushing.
Also, you may consider running some tests about the latest version of this
patch onto your hardware, to complement Amit tests?
--
Fabien.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: