When running with low rate, the --progress is only printed when there is
some activity, which makes it quite irregular, including some catching up
with stupid tps figures.
Shame on me for this "feature" (aka bug) in the first place.
This patch fixes this behavior by considering the next report time as a
target to meet as well as transaction schedule times.
Before the patch:
sh> ./pgbench -R 0.5 -T 10 -P 1 -S progress: 1.7 s, 0.6 tps, lat 6.028 ms stddev -nan, lag 1.883 ms progress: 2.2 s,
2.3tps, lat 2.059 ms stddev -nan, lag 0.530 ms progress: 7.3 s, 0.4 tps, lat 2.944 ms stddev 1.192, lag 2.624 ms
progress:7.3 s, 1402.5 tps, lat 5.115 ms stddev 0.000, lag 0.000 ms progress: 7.3 s, 0.0 tps, lat -nan ms stddev -nan,
laginf ms progress: 7.3 s, 335.2 tps, lat 3.106 ms stddev 0.000, lag 0.000 ms progress: 8.8 s, 0.0 tps, lat -nan ms
stddev-nan, lag inf ms progress: 8.8 s, 307.6 tps, lat 4.855 ms stddev -nan, lag 0.000 ms progress: 10.0 s, 0.0 tps,
lat-nan ms stddev -nan, lag -nan ms
After the patch:
sh> ./pgbench -R 0.5 -T 10 -P 1 -S progress: 1.0 s, 0.0 tps, lat -nan ms stddev -nan, lag -nan ms progress: 2.0 s, 1.0
tps,lat 5.980 ms stddev 0.000, lag 0.733 ms progress: 3.0 s, 1.0 tps, lat 1.905 ms stddev 0.000, lag 0.935 ms progress:
4.0s, 1.0 tps, lat 3.966 ms stddev 0.000, lag 0.623 ms progress: 5.0 s, 2.0 tps, lat 2.527 ms stddev 1.579, lag 0.512
msprogress: 6.0 s, 0.0 tps, lat -nan ms stddev -nan, lag -nan ms progress: 7.0 s, 0.0 tps, lat -nan ms stddev -nan, lag
-nanms progress: 8.0 s, 1.0 tps, lat 1.750 ms stddev 0.000, lag 0.767 ms progress: 9.0 s, 0.0 tps, lat -nan ms stddev
-nan,lag -nan ms progress: 10.0 s, 2.0 tps, lat 2.403 ms stddev 1.386, lag 0.357 ms
To answer a question before it is asked: I run low rates because I'm
looking at latency (rather than throughput) under different conditions.
For instance with the above tests, the latency is about 3 ms, but it
varies with the tps: (0.5 tps => 3 ms, 10 tps => 1 ms, 50 tps => 0.8 ms,
100 tps => 0.5 ms, 200 tps => 0.75 ms, 1000 tps => 0.5 ms...).
--
Fabien.