Re: Unfortunate choice of short switch name in pgbench
| От | Fabien COELHO |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Unfortunate choice of short switch name in pgbench |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | alpine.DEB.2.10.1402271621550.24661@sto обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Unfortunate choice of short switch name in pgbench (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Unfortunate choice of short switch name in pgbench
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
>>> ISTM that this is an unfortunate but unlikely mistake, as "-p" is >>> used in all postgresql commands to signify the port number (psql, >>> pg_dump, pg_basebackup, createdb, ...). > >> Plus other tools already use -P for progress, such as rsync. > > Yeah, but they don't make -P take an integer argument. It's that > little frammish that makes this problem significant. I do not see a strong case to make options with arguments case insensitive as a general rule. If this is done for -p/-P, why not -t/-T? If you really fell you must remove -P, please replace it by another one-letter, I use this option nearly everytime a run pgbench. -- Fabien.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: