Re: [PATCH] explain sortorder
От | Arne Scheffer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] explain sortorder |
Дата | |
Msg-id | alpine.DEB.2.02.1501141731430.3444@zivarne обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] explain sortorder (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] explain sortorder
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, we will also remove the following is lc_collate hint in the next version, showing only mandatory info as suggested. /* for those who use COLLATE although their default is already the wanted */ if (strcmp(collname,localeptr) == 0) { appendStringInfo(sortorderInformation, " (%s isLC_COLLATE)", collname); } Anybody insisting on that? Arne Note: I see, at the moment we use the wrong default for DESC. We'll fix that. On Wed, 14 Jan 2015, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > On 01/14/2015 05:26 PM, Timmer, Marius wrote: >> Hello Heikki, >> >> abbreviated version: >> Sorry, the problem is only the unhandy patch text format, not different >> opinions how to proceed. >> >> Long version: >> The v7 patch file already addressed your suggestions, >> but the file contained serveral (old) local commits, >> the new ones at the end of the patch text/file. > > Ah, missed that. I stopped reading when I saw the old stuff there :-). > >> v7.1 is attached and addresses this issue providing a clean patch file. > > Ok, thanks, will take a look. > >> V8 will - as mentioned - add missing docs and regression tests, > > Great! > > - Heikki > >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: