Re: Unsigned integer types

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Fabien COELHO
Тема Re: Unsigned integer types
Дата
Msg-id alpine.DEB.2.02.1305291942590.25496@localhost6.localdomain6
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Unsigned integer types  (Maciej Gajewski <maciej.gajewski0@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Unsigned integer types
Список pgsql-hackers
I agree that extensions are undermarketed. Although pgxn is a good step, 
I could not find it from "postgresql.org":-(

> I propose to not integrate the unsigned types into existing promotion
> hierarchy, and behave just like gcc would with -Werror: require
> explicit cast. Between them, the unsigned types would be automatically
> converted up (uint2 > uint4 > uint8).

If you do it, having uint1 (1 byte) would be nice as well.

-- 
Fabien.



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Heikki Linnakangas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: XLogInsert scaling, revisited
Следующее
От: Abhishek Rai
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_stat_replication when standby is unreachable