Re: pgbench vs. SERIALIZABLE

> My thinking is that what pgbench should do is:
> * track an error count
> * if it finds an error, don't increment the transaction count, but do
> increment the error count.
> * then continue to the next transaction.
>
> Does that seem like the right approach?

Could it retry the *same* transaction instead of the next one?

Should it give up trying under some conditions, say there are more errors 
than transactions?

-- 
Fabien.