Re: pg_dump far too slow
| От | Matthew Wakeling | 
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pg_dump far too slow | 
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | alpine.DEB.2.00.1003181113060.1887@aragorn.flymine.org обсуждение исходный текст  | 
		
| Ответ на | pg_dump far too slow (David Newall <postgresql@davidnewall.com>) | 
| Список | pgsql-performance | 
On Sun, 14 Mar 2010, David Newall wrote: > nohup time pg_dump -f database.dmp -Z9 database > > I presumed pg_dump was CPU-bound because of gzip compression, but a test I > ran makes that seem unlikely... There was some discussion about this a few months ago at http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2009-07/msg00348.php It seems that getting pg_dump to do the compression is a fair amount slower than piping the plain format dump straight through gzip. You get a bit more parallelism that way too. Matthew -- I'm always interested when [cold callers] try to flog conservatories. Anyone who can actually attach a conservatory to a fourth floor flat stands a marginally better than average chance of winning my custom. (Seen on Usenet)
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: