Re: GiST index performance

On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, dforum wrote:
> there is other performance problem on this request.
>
> If you analyse query plan, you see that most of the time are lost during
> sequencial scan, and you have 2 seq scan.

Nonsense. Sequential scans account for all of one or two seconds of
processing in these queries, which are 14 seconds and 38 minutes
respectively.

Matthew

--
 Doctor:  Are you okay? You appear to be injured.
 Neelix:  Aaaaaaah!
 Doctor:  It's okay, it looks superficial.
 Neelix:  Am I going to die?
 Doctor:  Not unless you are allergic to tomatoes. This appears to be a sauce
          some kind.