Re: Really dumb planner decision

Список
Период
Сортировка
От Matthew Wakeling
Тема Re: Really dumb planner decision
Дата
Msg-id alpine.DEB.2.00.0904161259590.4053@aragorn.flymine.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Really dumb planner decision  (Robert Haas)
Ответы Re: Really dumb planner decision  (Merlin Moncure)
Список pgsql-performance
Дерево обсуждения
Really dumb planner decision  (Matthew Wakeling, )
 Re: Really dumb planner decision  (Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz, )
  Re: Really dumb planner decision  (Matthew Wakeling, )
   Re: Really dumb planner decision  (Robert Haas, )
    Re: Really dumb planner decision  (Matthew Wakeling, )
     Re: Really dumb planner decision  (Merlin Moncure, )
      Re: Really dumb planner decision  (Tom Lane, )
       Re: Really dumb planner decision  ("Kevin Grittner", )
        Re: Really dumb planner decision  (Merlin Moncure, )
       Re: Really dumb planner decision  (Robert Haas, )
        Re: Really dumb planner decision  (Matthew Wakeling, )
         Re: Really dumb planner decision  (Tom Lane, )
 Re: Really dumb planner decision  (Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz, )
  Re: Really dumb planner decision  (Matthew Wakeling, )
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Robert Haas wrote:
> What happens if you change join_collapse_limit and from_collapse_limit
> to some huge number?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/runtime-config-query.html#GUC-FROM-COLLAPSE-LIMIT

That solves the problem. So, a view is treated as a subquery then?

Matthew

--
 Contrary to popular belief, Unix is user friendly. It just happens to be
 very selective about who its friends are.                 -- Kyle Hearn

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: GiST index performance
Следующее
От: Matthew Wakeling
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: GiST index performance