Re: Very specialised query

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Matthew Wakeling
Тема
Re: Very specialised query
Дата
Msg-id
alpine.DEB.2.00.0903261556340.21772@aragorn.flymine.org
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Re: Very specialised query "Marc Mamin" <M.Mamin@intershop.de>
Re: Very specialised query Matthew Wakeling <matthew@flymine.org>
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, Tom Lane wrote:
> No, it doesn't.  Have you thought about coding it in plpgsql?

*Looks* Nice.

So, it looks like I would be able to write a plpgsql function that returns 
a table equivalent to the query I posted earlier. However, I'd like to 
eat my cake *and* have it. My intention is to create a view with those 
results, and then use that view in all sorts of other queries. This will 
mean things like constraining the chromosome, or even constraining one of 
the locations.

The algorithm I quoted will work great for the simple case of generating 
*all* overlaps. However, it will not be ideal for when the chromosome is 
constrained (the constraint needs to be pushed into the query that the 
algorithm iterates over, rather than filtered after the algorithm runs), 
and it will be very much less than ideal when one of the locations is 
constrained (at which point a simple bio_seg index lookup is the fastest 
way).

Is there a way to define these three methods of generating the results and 
get the planner to choose the fastest one?

Matthew

-- 
 Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not
 tried it.                                               --Donald Knuth
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Very specialised query
От: Greg Smith
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Raid 10 chunksize
FAQ