Re: SSD performance

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Matthew Wakeling
Тема Re: SSD performance
Дата
Msg-id alpine.DEB.2.00.0902201523240.22170@aragorn.flymine.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: SSD performance  (Scott Carey <scott@richrelevance.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
On Fri, 30 Jan 2009, Scott Carey wrote:
> For anyone worried about the X 25–M’s ability to withstand lots of write
> cycles ... Calculate how long it would take you to write 800TB to the
> drive at a typical rate.  For most use cases that’s going to be > 5
> years.  For the 160GB version, it will take 2x as much data and time to
> wear it down.   

This article just came out:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/02/20/intel_x25emmental/

and

http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=669

It seems that the performance of the X25-M degrades over time, as the
write levelling algorithm fragments the device into little bits.
Especially under database-like access patterns.

Matthew

--
 I quite understand I'm doing algebra on the blackboard and the usual response
 is to throw objects...  If you're going to freak out... wait until party time
 and invite me along                     -- Computer Science Lecturer

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: marcin mank
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: not in(subselect) in 8.4
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: not in(subselect) in 8.4