On Sun, 22 Jan 2012, Maciek Sakrejda wrote:
> Thanks, Kris--I really appreciate the help. I added patches to the
> conversion script to strip the tags from that first set, but I'm still
> not sure what to do on the second set, since it looks like there is no
> other activity on the REL6_4 branch (no tags, even). It seems like
> what you are saying is that REL6_4 should just point at the next
> commit in the main development branch: is that right?
Correct.
> It looks like the same set of changes was committed to both trunk and
> the branch, and nothing else ever happened on that branch. You're
> saying that we should just drop that branch point and have the git
> branch point at f44a35... (see gist linked above) as a stub branch
> (that is, a branch with no commits of its own), yes?
Yes.
Also, I've posted an updated version of the CVS repo at:
http://ejurka.com/pgsql/tmp/
It didn't produce any new manufactured commits, so I think we're getting
close to being ready for a move. I will start a new thread to discuss the
actual details/timing of that.
Kris Jurka