On Fri, 14 May 2010, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Well, redoubling our current efforts to direct people to more
> specific lists would accomplish nothing, since doubling zero leaves
> you with zero. The description of -general includes:
Agreed ...
> Given that, the fact that -admin, -novice, -sql, and -performance
> collectively get as many posts as -general suggests that people are, in
> fact, making some effort to find a list which seems a good fit. Perhaps
> if the description of -general was changed to suggest it *was* a
> catch-all for posts which don't fit the other lists, things would
> improve.
Can you offer improvd / stronger wording on this ... ?
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A.
scrappy@hub.org http://www.hub.org
Yahoo:yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ:7615664 MSN:scrappy@hub.org